← Search

Gretchen Dumestre

Tigard, OR
0.0 year-end
44 matches · 17W–27L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Gretchen sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Gretchen is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gretchen has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Gretchen has gone from the 8th to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 39.9% of games
7.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history44 matches
W
2023-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonia Bouchard
+0.001about as expected — took 65% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2023-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Greenfield
−0.019below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Zadow
+0.021better than expected — took 41% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2022-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nora Semonsen
−0.040below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nora Semonsen
+0.014better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2022-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Seely
−0.031below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonia Bouchard
−0.003about as expected — took 60% of games against 57% expected
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2021-11-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Hart
+0.034better than expected — took 58% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2021-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Hart
+0.031better than expected — took 56% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2021-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marianne Conroy
+0.011below expectation — took 8% of games against 18% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2021-09-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marianne Conroy
−0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2021-07-24 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.055below expectation — took 8% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.