← Search

L Justin

Henderson, NV
0.0 year-end
70 matches · 18W–52L · seasons 2020–2023
Where L sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

L is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

L has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, L has gone from the 19th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
30%
12W–28L · 43.5% of games
4.0
20%
3W–12L · 35.9% of games
7.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 36.6% of games
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history70 matches
L
Andre Cheng / Linda Briggsmixed
2023-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Miguel Pontillas
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juan Gonzalez
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Matt Rommel / Elizabeth Ryanmixed
2023-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Armando Ronconi
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 36% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Pursel
+0.000better than expected — took 54% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2023-02-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Pursel
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Jeremy Christensen / LOURDES MENDOZAmixed
2023-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Albert Ferguson
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
COLE BOREN / Shannan Ohlsonmixed
2023-01-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Miller
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
Dennis Hendershot / Jenny Baxtermixed
2023-01-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Miller
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2022-10-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Richard van Diepen
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Mike Little / Tanya Halemixed
2022-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Richard van Diepen
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Josephine McPeak / Waldo Fengmixed
2022-09-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rene Mauban
+0.000better than expected — took 68% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Adam Klunick / Priscila Cergolmixed
2022-08-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scot Martin
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 23% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.