← Search

Charlotte Carey

MARYSVILLE, WA
0.0 year-end
77 matches · 32W–45L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Charlotte sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Charlotte is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Charlotte has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Charlotte has gone from the 42nd to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
9W–3L · 60.3% of games
3.0
21.4%
6W–22L · 39% of games
6.0
50%
7W–7L · 53.2% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history77 matches
L
2022-10-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy McPherson
−0.053below expectation — took 25% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2022-10-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Emilie Purhar
+0.156better than expected — took 100% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Connie Worthen / Joseph Staehelichamps
2022-10-02 · #3 Doubles · with Kevin McMahan
−0.026below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Douglas Beck / Viktoria Ralphmixed
2022-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brad Raynor
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Petrus Wong / Annelies Smithmixed
2022-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tony Carey
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Jim Pinkerton / Victoria van Gelderenmixed
2022-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tony Carey
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Courtney Martin / Kristi Spouse
2022-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Foley
−0.041below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2022-05-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Foley
+0.053better than expected — took 100% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Charu Bogdan / Danette Sellman
2022-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy McPherson
−0.037below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2022-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emilie Purhar
−0.005below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Betsy Chamberlin / Brooke Stabbert
2022-04-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emilie Purhar
+0.020better than expected — took 47% of games against 39% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-02-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natasha Trujillo
−0.005below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.