← Search

Ursula Heenan

Kirkland, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
169 matches · 87W–82L · seasons 2021–2025
Where Ursula sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Ursula is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ursula has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Ursula has gone from the 62nd to the 45th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
61.5%
24W–15L · 58.4% of games
3.5
50.8%
32W–31L · 51.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 38.5% of games
6.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 57.6% of games
7.0mixed
43.5%
10W–13L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history169 matches
L
Mina Park / Rebecca Garibay
2025-05-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Waters
+0.005about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Yasmeen Mar / Daye Chung
2025-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Paula Ramirez Orozco
−0.012below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Casey
−0.029below expectation — took 39% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
May-Jun Chao / Livia Zhu
2025-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Casey
+0.035better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Ashley Hampton / Marie Fahey
2025-04-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Calquhoun
−0.008about as expected — took 53% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Corbett
−0.024below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Maile Intrachat / Lyndsey Gillis
2025-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Waters
+0.002about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Waters
−0.048below expectation — took 37% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Waters
−0.009about as expected — took 68% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Mila Niset / Katrina Miller
2025-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Waters
+0.011better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Waters
−0.020below expectation — took 47% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jerel Navarrete
+0.000better than expected — took 46% of games against 28% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.