← Search

Veronica Serrero

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
60 matches · 43W–17L · seasons 2020–2022
Where Veronica sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Veronica is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Veronica has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Veronica has gone from the 58th to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 71% of games
3.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 53% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 58.8% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 68.1% of games
6.5mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 60.6% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
2022-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Scott
−0.044below expectation — took 71% of games against 80% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2022-02-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jarvis
−0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Kari Allen / Sheri Harper
2022-01-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jarvis
+0.036better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-01-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jarvis
−0.005about as expected — took 40% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-01-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Medas
−0.037below expectation — took 45% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2021-11-13 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.036about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Brenda Rowles / Marissa McGee
2021-10-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Medas
−0.023below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Megan Bender / Stacy Whitehead
2021-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jarvis
−0.011about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2021-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Medas
+0.002about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Debbie Fleury / Mary Barry
2021-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Medas
−0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Kathy Robinson / Brent Muirmixed
2021-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Clint Ramos
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2021-10-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Medas
+0.015about as expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.