← Search

Lori Allsup

Olympia, WA
0.0 year-end
42 matches · 11W–31L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Lori sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Lori is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lori has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Lori has gone from the 3rd to the 11th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 45.6% of games
3.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 38.8% of games
7.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history42 matches
W
2022-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Brazel
+0.014better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2022-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Hardcastle
−0.044below expectation — took 0% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Hardcastle
+0.008about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Nancy Meyer / Ibolya Stark
2022-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Hardcastle
+0.026better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Smith
−0.024below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Elizabeth Johnson / Marcy Duenhoelter
2022-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Phinney
+0.031better than expected — took 33% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-01-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Smith
+0.016better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2021-11-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Brazel
−0.024below expectation — took 42% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2021-11-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Tracy
+0.011about as expected — took 45% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2021-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Pace
−0.053below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2021-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochelle Fransen
−0.002about as expected — took 55% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2021-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachelle Ames
+0.008about as expected — took 42% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.