← Search

Caprice Pine

BLAINE, WA
0.0 year-end
62 matches · 21W–41L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Caprice sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Caprice is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Caprice has been a steady 2.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.02.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
60%
9W–6L · 47.7% of games
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.6% of games
6.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 43.5% of games
6.0mixed
15.8%
3W–16L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history62 matches
L
2022-03-19 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gesina Howard
−0.033below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Rhenda Meiser / Erin Oest-Larsen
2022-01-28 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Natalie Banks
+0.070better than expected — took 80% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Debara Ferleman / Rebecca Buxbaum
2022-01-22 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Natalie Banks
−0.001about as expected — took 58% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2021-11-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brenda Schlemlein
−0.040below expectation — took 42% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Irva Cooper / Karen Walker
2021-11-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brenda Schlemlein
+0.038better than expected — took 41% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Lee Aalund / Adawna Windom
2021-10-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brenda Schlemlein
+0.022better than expected — took 65% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2021-10-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Morikubo
−0.037below expectation — took 8% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2021-08-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Glen Furnas
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Toni-Ann Lupinacci / Andrew Sachsmixed
2021-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Glen Furnas
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2021-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Glen Furnas
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 25% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2021-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sheila Kirkegaard
−0.021below expectation — took 35% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2021-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gesina Howard
−0.082below expectation — took 0% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.