← Search

Caprice Pine

BLAINE, WA
0.0 year-end
62 matches · 21W–41L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Caprice Pine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2022-03-19 · EDG-Edgebrook Edge-Kirkegaard · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gesina Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2022-01-28 · EDG-Edgebrook Edge-Kirkegaard · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Natalie Banks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-01-22 · EDG-Edgebrook Edge-Kirkegaard · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Natalie Banks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2021-11-14 · EDG-55+ and Fabulous Edgebrook Ladies-Pine · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brenda Schlemlein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2021-11-13 · EDG-55+ and Fabulous Edgebrook Ladies-Pine · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brenda Schlemlein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2021-10-30 · EDG-55+ and Fabulous Edgebrook Ladies-Pine · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brenda Schlemlein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2021-10-10 · EDG-55+ and Fabulous Edgebrook Ladies-Pine · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Morikubo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2021-08-07 · EDG-Pine · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Glen Furnas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2021-07-24 · EDG-Pine · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Glen Furnas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-07-18 · EDG-Pine · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Glen Furnas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2021-06-12 · EDG-Kirkegaard · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sheila Kirkegaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2021-05-15 · EDG-Kirkegaard · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gesina Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
60%
9W–6L · 47.7% of games
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.6% of games
6.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 43.5% of games
6.0mixed
15.8%
3W–16L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer