← Search

Cathie Recker

DEL MAR, CA
4.0C year-end 2023
34 matches · 13W–21L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Cathie sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Cathie is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cathie has been a steady 4.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2023, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Cathie has gone from the 26th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 29.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history34 matches
L
2024-01-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Cobb
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2023-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Cobb
+0.023better than expected — took 52% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2023-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Cobb
+0.009better than expected — took 68% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2023-03-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Domagalski
−0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Anh Nguyen / Michiko Hunter
2023-01-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Benkstein
+0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Molly Odonnell / Boon Yon Joung
2022-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Wright
−0.004below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Philippa Stasiuk / Michele Sutherland
2022-02-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Wright
−0.006below expectation — took 44% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2022-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Meyer
−0.009below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Meyer
−0.053below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-01-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Dombek
−0.015below expectation — took 40% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2022-01-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dee Deggs
+0.037better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2021-11-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Caplan
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.