Teams

TCSP-Mixed Drinks 8.0-Lindburg

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.97 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-11-06vs STC-SuverLost 03
L#1 DoublesAudley Becker / Lisa Mckenny vs Eric Hagen / Mindy Blakeslee2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Nickel / Emily Barrett vs Jennifer Czeisler / Stephen Rosen3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMerritt Johnson / Monica Blum vs Jeff Blackburn / Anne Blackburn1-6, 0-6
2020-10-17vs BC-Camara-2021-8.0-Mixed 18Won 21
L#1 DoublesJulia Hartvigson / Grant Hartvigson vs Jackie Vandenberg / Sam Varon4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCaleb Blum / Lisa Mckenny vs Aaron Coe / Jodi Major6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Dannemiller / Kirstin Anderson vs Alex Camara / Iwona Sakalus6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesEmily Barrett / Matthew Dannemiller vs Ron Eisenberger / Aline Pereira4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Mckenny / Caleb Blum vs Kathleen Nolan / Michael Liu6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMonica Blum / Merritt Johnson vs Terra Yara / Yutaro Maki5-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesJulia Hartvigson / Grant Hartvigson vs Martin Goldman-Kirst / Jennifer Kohler2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Mckenny / Daniel Nickel vs Jessica Chen / Samuel Bradley5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrady Gustafson / Sarah Gustafson vs Wataru Ueno / Alexandra Ryan3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesEmily Barrett / Eric Lindburg vs Tedd Romero / Alma Estioco6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Dannemiller / Sara Addicott vs Christina Broadwin / Chuck Pecka6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBrady Gustafson / Sarah Gustafson vs Elliot Broadwin / Maryse Sparks2-6, 4-6
2020-09-05vs PL-SinghLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulia Hartvigson / Grant Hartvigson vs Kim Evans / Prasad Gopalkrishnan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSara Addicott / Audley Becker vs Laurie Ono / Jai Singh7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKirstin Anderson / Dan Eder vs Kyla Tiedeman / Aswin Krishnan1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Grant Hartvigson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Matthew Dannemiller
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.94
Emily Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.94
Sarah Gustafson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Lisa Mckenny
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.86
Brady Gustafson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Julia Hartvigson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Sara Addicott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Audley Becker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Daniel Nickel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Kirstin Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Dan Eder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Eric Lindburg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Monica Blum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Caleb Blum
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Hartvigson + Grant Hartvigson26661% games+5.8% vs expected
Sarah Gustafson + Brady Gustafson181056% games+3.9% vs expected
Eric Lindburg + Sara Addicott5552% games+2.6% vs expected
Lisa Mckenny + Caleb Blum5155% games−3.4% vs expected
Lisa Mckenny + Daniel Nickel5356% games−4.5% vs expected
Dan Eder + Sara Addicott3353% gamesnot enough data
Monica Blum + Caleb Blum044 matchesnot enough data
Monica Blum + Grant Hartvigson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Grant Hartvigson
119W–40L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Matthew Dannemiller
106W–21L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Emily Barrett
132W–62L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Sarah Gustafson
73W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Lisa Mckenny
111W–77L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Brady Gustafson
78W–32L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Julia Hartvigson
96W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Sara Addicott
92W–99L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Audley Becker
60W–41L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Daniel Nickel
41W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Kirstin Anderson
87W–44L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Dan Eder
74W–103L career · 1 line in 2021
21%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Eric Lindburg
91W–114L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Monica Blum
105W–100L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Caleb Blum
56W–83L career · 7 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.