← Search

Carrie Bergquist

— year-end
14 matches · 7W–7L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Carrie Bergquist to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2022-07-07 · BETC-Hughes · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Barbara Selemon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2019-10-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Reeves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2019-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2019-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Sarah Taylor / Sylvian Colley
2019-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2019-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Lindy Gaylord / Kathy Kane
2019-04-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Coreen Robbins / Chairuna Antono
2019-03-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lila Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2019-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruthann Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2019-02-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jesse Chute
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2019-01-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Wakefield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2018-09-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Boettger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
6.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 71% of the time
#1 Doubles
71%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal