Search

Takumi Koyama

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
71 matches · 47W–24L · seasons 20192022
Where Takumi sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Takumi is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams67 teams · 2009–2024
THPRD-Wu/Rankin
2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2024
THPRD-Lee
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women
2024
Harrigan/Mohr
2023 One Doubles · 4.0 Women
2023
THPRD-Wu/Rankin
2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed
2023
THPRD-Lee
2023 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women
2023
THPRD-Mohr/Harrigan
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Takumi has been a steady 4.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Takumi has gone from the 44th to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
75.9%
22W–7L · 55.8% of games
8.0
90%
9W–1L · 63.6% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.8% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history71 matches
W
Ann Harradon / Lori Poulinchamps
2022-10-22 · THPRD-Mohr/Harrigan · #3 Doubles · with Flor Harrigan
0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Melissa Agena / Noriko Tamamotochamps
2022-10-22 · THPRD-Mohr/Harrigan · #2 Doubles · with Flor Harrigan
0.056below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Kathleen Hansen / Kelly Footechamps
2022-10-21 · THPRD-Mohr/Harrigan · #3 Doubles · with Flor Harrigan
0.066below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2022-07-17 · Harrigan/Mohr · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rie Sasakawa
+0.037better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2022-07-06 · Harrigan/Mohr · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Mohr
0.002about as expected — took 54% of games against 55% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2022-06-26 · THPRD-Mohr/Harrigan · #3 Doubles · with Flor Harrigan
0.049below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2022-06-25 · THPRD-Mohr/Harrigan · #1 Doubles · with Flor Harrigan
0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2022-06-24 · THPRD-Mohr/Harrigan · #3 Doubles · with Flor Harrigan
+0.039better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Sarah Townley / Kathryn Eddy
2022-06-12 · THPRD-Mohr/Harrigan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Flor Harrigan
0.006about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2022-06-11 · THPRD-Mohr/Harrigan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Flor Harrigan
0.016below expectation — took 44% of games against 54% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2022-05-14 · THPRD-Mohr/Harrigan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Flor Harrigan
+0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-05-08 · THPRD-Mohr/Harrigan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Kennish
+0.029better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.