Search

Leslie Sampson

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
42 matches · 27W–15L · seasons 20192025
Where Leslie sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Leslie is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Leslie has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Leslie has gone from the 74th to the 47th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 53.3% of games
6.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 59.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history42 matches
W
2024-12-07 · #1 Doubles · with Julia Plowman
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-11-16 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ashley Bevan
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-3
W
Naveed Hasan / Luda Rosenberg
2024-09-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lucia Parker
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-06-29 · #2 Doubles · with Michelle Boucher
0.016below expectation — took 46% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Boucher
+0.009better than expected — took 86% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Matteri
+0.009better than expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Matteri
+0.028better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-11-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Cooke
+0.017better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-11-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julia Plowman
+0.021better than expected — took 68% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Patty Booth / Carmen Timberlake
2023-10-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anita Palodichuk
0.010about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-10-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Cooke
0.049below expectation — took 8% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2023-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Plowman
+0.042better than expected — took 63% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.