← Search

Steven Harrison

BEND, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 45W–35L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Steven Harrison to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2024-03-02 · SAC-Anderson/Elmer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mauro Kobrinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-24 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa McConachie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-02-18 · SAC-Anderson/Elmer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Chapler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-5
W
2024-02-17 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lara Greenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-02-11 · SAC-Anderson/Elmer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Elmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-02-10 · SAC-Anderson/Elmer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2024-02-09 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lara Greenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2023-11-10 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lara Greenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2023-11-04 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lara Greenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2023-10-29 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lara Greenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-09-15 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jinmi Kemple mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-04-22 · SAC-Harrison · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2018–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
55.3%
26W–21L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
58.3%
14W–10L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
24 matches
#1 Singles
24%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams