Search

Kristine Creel

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
47 matches · 32W–15L · seasons 20192022
Where Kristine sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Kristine is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kristine has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
92.3%
24W–2L · 67.1% of games
3.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
L
Lara Stone / Suzana Sanchez
2022-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Spinella
0.019below expectation — took 44% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
2022-11-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Spinella
+0.030better than expected — took 43% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Judith Milligan / Tina Walker
2022-10-26 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liliya Pummill
+0.040better than expected — took 59% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Blanca Avila / Wendy Cardenas
2022-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Travis Azous
+0.013better than expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Christine McNaught / Heather George
2022-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Spinella
+0.005about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Lefebvre
0.012below expectation — took 43% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2022-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liliya Pummill
0.073below expectation — took 25% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Ann Pham / Laura Larsen
2022-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Spinella
+0.023about as expected — took 37% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Kerri Comings / Helen Johnson
2022-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Spinella
0.018below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Kristi Crawford / Cynthia Lau
2022-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Spinella
+0.047better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2022-03-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liliya Pummill
+0.014better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
Bing Zou / Christy Moxley
2022-03-09 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Protell
+0.007about as expected — took 45% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.