← Search

Jennifer Ederer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Seattle, WA
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
24 matches · 13W–11L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history24 matches
L
2026-09-27 · STC-Tightly Strung-Mulberg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Edlin
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-19 · STC-Tightly Strung-Mulberg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with J Weed
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-03 · STC-Tightly Strung-Mulberg · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Celia Evans
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-28 · STC-Tightly Strung-Mulberg · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Celia Evans
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2021-06-11 · STC-Britton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Stonecipher
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-05-20 · STC-Britton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Fitzgerald
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2021-04-29 · STC-Britton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Ancinas
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-04-22 · STC-Britton · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Medved
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2021-03-27 · STC-Knox · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Medved
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2021-03-20 · STC-Knox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dena Mulberg
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-03-13 · STC-Knox · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dena Mulberg
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2020-02-28 · STC-Knox · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Campbell
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 47% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 58% of the time
#3 Doubles
58%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert