Search

Jen Woods

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
18 matches · 11W–7L · seasons 20192022
Where Jen sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Jen is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams25 teams · 2013–2022
IRV-Lyon
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women
2022
IRV-Lyon/Kayser
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2022
IRV-Corder
2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women
2020
IRV-Lyon
2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2019
IRV-Lyon
2019 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women
2019
IRV-Selis
2019 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jen has been a steady 4.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920202022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jen has gone from the 82nd to the 54th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history18 matches
L
2022-05-13 · IRV-Lyon/Kayser · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Miller
0.068below expectation — took 25% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2022-05-06 · IRV-Lyon/Kayser · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Miller
0.021below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2022-02-26 · IRV-Lyon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antoinette Ann Reno
0.018below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2022-02-20 · IRV-Lyon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Elliott
+0.029better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Loo Yah Leong / Heike Droste
2022-02-18 · IRV-Lyon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Hendrickson
0.018about as expected — took 56% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2022-02-05 · IRV-Lyon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antoinette Ann Reno
0.010about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-01-22 · IRV-Lyon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antoinette Ann Reno
+0.001better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2020-02-29 · IRV-Corder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Corder
0.045below expectation — took 71% of games against 80% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2020-02-15 · IRV-Corder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Alpern
+0.022better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2020-02-09 · IRV-Corder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Paulk
0.012below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2019-06-29 · IRV-Lyon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Porter
+0.003about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
Jil Delanty / Irene Feldun
2019-06-15 · IRV-Lyon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Rothert
+0.015better than expected — took 80% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.