Search

Craig Mcreary

Longview, WA
0.0 year-end
88 matches · 45W–43L · seasons 20192024
Where Craig sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Craig is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams29 teams · 2016–2024
MV-Harlan
2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2024
MV-Harbell
2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2024
MV-Anderson
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2022
MV-Harbell
2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2021
MV-Anderson
2021 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2021
MV-Fisher
2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Craig has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Craig has gone from the 9th to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 63.1% of games
4.0
16%
4W–21L · 39.1% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.4% of games
7.0mixed
68%
17W–8L · 56.3% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history88 matches
W
Mihee Park / Kok Waii Wongmixed
2024-03-10 · MV-Harbell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecile Bamer
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2024-03-02 · MV-Harbell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecile Bamer
+0.000better than expected — took 40% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-02-18 · MV-Harbell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Harbell
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-02-10 · MV-Harbell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecile Bamer
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-02-03 · MV-Harbell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecile Bamer
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-01-27 · MV-Harbell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Harbell
+0.000better than expected — took 41% of games against 32% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Cathy Gatzke / Cary Gatzkemixed
2024-01-07 · MV-Harbell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Harbell
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-12-02 · MV-Harlan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Harlan
+0.000better than expected — took 44% of games against 28% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Sara Crate / John Michael Murphymixed
2023-11-18 · MV-Harlan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Harlan
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2023-10-22 · MV-Harlan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Harlan
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 29% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-10-15 · MV-Harlan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Harlan
+0.000better than expected — took 37% of games against 20% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Adam Oken / William Wang
2022-03-27 · MV-Anderson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Harbell
+0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.