← Search

Stephanie Ecklund

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
51 matches · 30W–21L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Stephanie sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Stephanie is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stephanie has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Stephanie has gone from the 51st to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.0
60%
30W–20L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history51 matches
L
2022-04-26 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nyree Hartman Saad
−0.013below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 3-1
L
Nadine Kluger / Debra Larotonda
2022-03-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Morley
−0.032below expectation — took 46% of games against 59% expected
7-6
L
Jonna Gilmore / Taylor Larson
2022-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Wood
−0.011below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Schoolmeester
−0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Loretta Moses / Monica Taylor
2022-02-22 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anjanette Bixel
+0.026better than expected — took 57% of games against 45% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Debra Hill / Brooke Rice
2022-02-15 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen McDaniel
+0.009better than expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-02-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annette Bradley
−0.046below expectation — took 8% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
N/A
2022-01-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Schoolmeester
+0.087better than expected — took 100% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Gerri Ellis / Lauren Pena
2022-01-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Schoolmeester
+0.010better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2022-01-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Berman
−0.013below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2021-12-07 · #3 Doubles · with Jamie O'Connell
−0.010below expectation — took 35% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2021-11-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Row
−0.006below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.