← Search

Gina Layton

Auburn, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 16W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gina Layton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-06-06 · BETC-Schiller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacia Servos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · BETC-Schiller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maileen Walz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-26 · BETC-Schiller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacia Servos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-28 · BETC-Shaheen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-20 · BETC-Shaheen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nona Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-10 · BETC-Shaheen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Schiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-19 · BETC-True Grit-Shaheen/Almer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Almer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-09-28 · BETC-True Grit-Shaheen/Almer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Almer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2024-05-18 · BETC-Alquiza/Tran · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chantal Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-03 · BETC-Faultless-Shaheen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Myrna Alquiza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-19 · BETC-Faultless-Shaheen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chantal Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2023-10-01 · BETC-Almer · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Butterfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
44%
11W–14L · 47.5% of games
3.5
10.7%
3W–25L · 34.2% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#1 Singles
16%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe