Search

Gina Layton

Auburn, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
58 matches · 16W–42L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.08
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
17%
stay 3.0
83%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 63% stay · 37% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.97. Lower than today’s 3.08 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Auburn · 3.0
2 of 9
WA · 3.0
134 of 755

Gina is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gina has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Gina has gone from the 3rd to the 1st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
44%
11W–14L · 47.5% of games
3.5
10.7%
3W–25L · 34.2% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
Jenn Lee / Kayla Evans
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacia Servos
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Eileen Lu / Jane Zhu
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maileen Walz
0.002below expectation — took 14% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Lisa Tillman / Asha DSouza
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacia Servos
0.052below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Evelyn Wong / Anne Drammeh
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Johnson
0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nona Allison
0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Schiller
0.006below expectation — took 35% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Almer
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-2
L
Isabelle Ochsner / Ana Maria Freund
2024-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Almer
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 7-6
L
2024-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chantal Tran
0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-03-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Myrna Alquiza
0.015below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-01-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chantal Tran
0.013below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Ann Rae Smith / Melanie Gerard
2023-10-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Butterfield
+0.011better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.