Search

Veronica Turner

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
61 matches · 23W–38L · seasons 20192022
Where Veronica sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Veronica is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Veronica has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Veronica has gone from the 28th to the 11th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 45.4% of games
4.0
35.8%
19W–34L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history61 matches
L
Rika Cook / Kelly Maier
2022-03-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carmen Miller Branch
+0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Claudia Hernandez / Rebecca Geinzer
2022-03-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanna Banks
0.080below expectation — took 8% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2022-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Pettigrew
0.033below expectation — took 35% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2022-02-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Little
+0.011better than expected — took 86% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2022-02-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Ryan
0.017below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2022-02-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Pettigrew
0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Wendy Cardenas / Michelle Castillo
2022-01-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mari Valvo
0.041below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Lyudmila Kotseva / Terry Powers
2022-01-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hilary Vincent-Philpot
+0.020better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2021-11-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Whipple
0.030below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Julie MacDonald / Milly Joyner
2021-11-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Linares
+0.034better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2021-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Ryan
0.025below expectation — took 44% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Lucy Twohy / Hillary Hall
2021-10-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Ryan
+0.066better than expected — took 40% of games against 20% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.