Search

Michaela Bancud

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
76 matches · 26W–50L · seasons 20192025
Where Michaela sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Michaela is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams55 teams · 2006–2025
MAC-Hasle/Doherty
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women
2025
MAC-Pickard/Lovett
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2025
MAC-Go/Lovett
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women
2025
MAC-Landers
2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2025
MAC-Luthi/Wilcox
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women
2024
MAC-Luthi/Pickard
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michaela has been a steady 4.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Michaela has gone from the 25th to the 32nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
37.2%
16W–27L · 46.2% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 60.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
26.1%
6W–17L · 41.6% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history76 matches
L
2025-04-12 · MAC-Hasle/Doherty · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina McMenamin
+0.017about as expected — took 25% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-03-16 · MAC-Pickard/Lovett · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Metcalf
+0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-02-02 · MAC-Pickard/Lovett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Metcalf
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-11-17 · MAC-Go/Lovett · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Luthi
0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-03 · MAC-Go/Lovett · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Herbst
+0.039better than expected — took 53% of games against 36% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
N/A
2024-10-26 · MAC-Go/Lovett · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Zabel
0.029better than expected — took 100% of games against 94% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Cindy Rushall / Lucia von Flotow
2024-10-20 · MAC-Go/Lovett · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Hummelt
0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
MELISSA PISHION BOTTA / Erika Wilson
2024-09-29 · MAC-Go/Lovett · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susie Jansky
+0.003about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-05 · MAC-Luthi/Pickard · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Pickard
0.028below expectation — took 32% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2024-03-23 · MAC-Luthi/Wilcox · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Luthi
0.002better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-02-04 · MAC-Luthi/Wilcox · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lilly
+0.016better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-02-03 · MAC-Luthi/Wilcox · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bell
0.022below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.