Search

Sarah Yoseloff

Henderson, NV
0.0 year-end
125 matches · 62W–63L · seasons 20192024
Where Sarah sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Sarah is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sarah has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202020222024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sarah has gone from the 75th to the 81st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
69.8%
37W–16L · 58.9% of games
4.0
23.7%
9W–29L · 39.8% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 51.1% of games
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 49.1% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history125 matches
L
2024-09-30 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Lanni
0.076below expectation — took 8% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Charlotte Hart / Angela Thalgott
2024-09-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Syme
0.005about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2022-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Twells
0.120below expectation — took 20% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Horton
0.072below expectation — took 14% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Lorri McElroy / Linda Norris
2022-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Horton
0.025below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2020-12-15 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Wogalter
0.054below expectation — took 25% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2020-12-07 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Wogalter
+0.020better than expected — took 48% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Cynthia Graham / Jacqueline Smallwood
2020-12-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Waters
0.021below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2020-12-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cerny
0.011about as expected — took 58% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Luanne Balelo / John Balelomixed
2020-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kih Gourrier
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Hope Nulf / Elizabeth Ryan
2020-11-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Berkovits
+0.009better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2020-11-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cerny
0.031below expectation — took 67% of games against 72% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.