Search

Jaime Aranda-Michel

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
65 matches · 48W–17L · seasons 20222025
Where Jaime sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Jaime is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
SHC-Allen
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2026
CRRC-Ash/Johnson
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2025
SHC-Lomax
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2025
LOTC-Mounts/Rich
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men
2025
CRRC-Ash/Johnson
2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2024
N OR-CRRC-Ash
2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jaime has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jaime has gone from the 97th to the 93rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
90%
18W–2L · 72.6% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 71.8% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 60.5% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 61.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history65 matches
L
2025-06-14 · SHC-Lomax · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arron Heriford
0.018below expectation — took 40% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-05-17 · SHC-Lomax · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Griggs
0.027below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-11-12 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Mounts
+0.011better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-11-03 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Rich
+0.033better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Amy Liu / Jason Tranmixed
2024-10-06 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Glenn
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-10-06 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Rich
+0.024better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-09-29 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Rich
0.008about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2024-09-28 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Glenn
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 73% expected
6-1
L
2024-09-20 · LOTC-Mounts/Rich · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Rich
0.045below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Miriam Latzer / Brendan Adamczykmixed
2024-09-08 · CRRC-Ash/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karin Owens
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-08-10 · N OR-LOTC-Mounts · #2 Doubles · with Blake Simonsen
+0.014about as expected — took 35% of games against 34% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Kent Gavin / Ben Sorochukchamps
2024-08-10 · N OR-LOTC-Mounts · #3 Doubles · with Manoj Agnihotri
0.020below expectation — took 43% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.